linkedin
rss
twitter
email
Editorial: 020 8295 8304
  • Home
  • About The Paper
  • Subscribe
BREAKING NEWS
IFSEC Europe launched by event organiser Informa in strategic move to extend IFSEC brand
Orbis Protect-Keynetics partnership set to enhance security for site managers
IDIS Global Partners Summit focuses on analytics and end-to-end solutions
Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK join forces to raise awareness of apprenticeship opportunities
Make UK/BDO Report: “Industry warns of damaging ‘double whammy’ hit to regions from ‘no-deal’ Brexit outcome”
Open forum Question Time at SiX seeks to tackle key security and fire business sector issues
Bosch launches new information security services to protect against cyber attacks
“Strong organic growth” across first six months of 2019 reported by FM specialist ISS Group in latest set of financial statements
67% of UK-based businesses feel cyber security worries prevent new technology adoption
Department for International Trade unveils detail of new UK Security Export Strategy
Securitas highlights strong 6% organic sales growth in financials for January-June 2019
Inner Range announces integration plans with Swiss biometrics specialist TBS

Report raises concerns over Met Police trials of live facial recognition technology

Posted On 24 Jul 2019
By : Brian Sims
Comment: 0

A new report produced by researchers from the Human Rights, Big Data and Technology Project based at the University of Essex’s Human Rights Centre identifies “significant flaws” with the way in which live facial recognition technology was trialled in London by the Metropolitan Police Service.

This is the first independently-funded academic report into the use of live facial recognition technology by a UK police force and it raises concerns about the Metropolitan Police Service’s procedures, practices and Human Rights compliance during the trials.

The authors of the report, namely Professor Peter Fussey and Dr Daragh Murray, conclude that it’s “highly possible” the Metropolitan Police Service’s use of live facial recognition to date would be held unlawful if challenged in a Court of Law. They’ve also documented what they believe to be “significant operational shortcomings” in the trials which may well affect the viability of any future use of live facial recognition technology.

In light of their findings, Professor Fussey and Dr Murray are calling for all live trials of live facial recognition to be ceased until these concerns are addressed, noting that it’s essential Human Rights compliance is ensured before deployment, and that there be an appropriate level of public scrutiny and debate on a national level.

To read the full article subscribe to The Paper here

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk Xtra (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute’s George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014. Brian was launch Editor for The Paper in September 2015 and appointed Editor of Risk Xtra in May 2018.
  • google-share
Previous Story

“Modest growth outlook beset by ‘No-Deal’ Brexit risk” suggests CBI’s latest Economic Forecast

Next Story

“Two-thirds of UK companies admit to never testing physical security measures” pinpoints Jacksons Fencing study

Recent Posts

  • IFSEC Europe launched by event organiser Informa in strategic move to extend IFSEC brand
  • Orbis Protect-Keynetics partnership set to enhance security for site managers
  • IDIS Global Partners Summit focuses on analytics and end-to-end solutions
  • Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK join forces to raise awareness of apprenticeship opportunities
  • Make UK/BDO Report: “Industry warns of damaging ‘double whammy’ hit to regions from ‘no-deal’ Brexit outcome”
0

IDIS Global Partners Summit focuses on analytics and end-to-end solutions

The latest advances in video analytics – including improved classification, accuracy and spe
Posted On 23 Oct 2019
0

Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK join forces to raise awareness of apprenticeship opportunities

Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK are launching a new Electronic Security Systems
Posted On 23 Oct 2019

Register for updates

Contact Editorial:

  1. Name *
    * Please enter your name
  2. Email *
    * Please enter a valid email address
  3. Message *
    * Please enter message

© Pro-Activ Publications, 2021.

All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Content on this website, including materials available for download, are supplied solely for the private use of visitors to this site, and must not be redistributed by third party sites, or as part of any marketing or promotional material, without permission in writing from the publisher.While every care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of material included in The Paper (both the hardcopy publications and this website), the publishers cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the information contained herein, or any consequence arising from it.

7ads6x98y