linkedin
rss
twitter
email
Editorial: 020 8295 8304
  • Home
  • About The Paper
  • Subscribe
BREAKING NEWS
IFSEC Europe launched by event organiser Informa in strategic move to extend IFSEC brand
Orbis Protect-Keynetics partnership set to enhance security for site managers
IDIS Global Partners Summit focuses on analytics and end-to-end solutions
Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK join forces to raise awareness of apprenticeship opportunities
Make UK/BDO Report: “Industry warns of damaging ‘double whammy’ hit to regions from ‘no-deal’ Brexit outcome”
Open forum Question Time at SiX seeks to tackle key security and fire business sector issues
Bosch launches new information security services to protect against cyber attacks
“Strong organic growth” across first six months of 2019 reported by FM specialist ISS Group in latest set of financial statements
67% of UK-based businesses feel cyber security worries prevent new technology adoption
Department for International Trade unveils detail of new UK Security Export Strategy
Securitas highlights strong 6% organic sales growth in financials for January-June 2019
Inner Range announces integration plans with Swiss biometrics specialist TBS

“Two-thirds of UK companies admit to never testing physical security measures” pinpoints Jacksons Fencing study

Posted On 24 Jul 2019
By : Brian Sims
Comment: 0

Almost two-thirds (63%) of UK companies who took part in a recent survey have admitted to never testing their physical security regime. That’s according to ‘Setting the Standard for Security’, a report produced by physical security solutions expert Jacksons Fencing.

Given that 22% of companies say the consequences of a security breach are severe, including public disruption or even the loss of life, these findings give much cause for concern.

Less than half of the survey respondents had heard of key security certifications, including the Loss Prevention Certification Board’s (LPCB) LPS 1175 (45%) and Secured by Design (SBD) (42%), while only 38% ever consult security experts. Worryingly, this suggests many are unaware that their solutions may not be fit for purpose or may not know what criteria they should be looking for.

Third party certification bodies such as the LPCB and the police-inspired SBD help to provide specifiers with independently tested security products that will offer an appropriate level of protection against forced entry depending on a site’s needs. Recently, the LPCB introduced LPS 1175: Issue 8, a new performance classification system that provides an even deeper and adaptive approach to identify and tackle the increasingly diverse methods and attack tools used by hostile actors.

The introduction of LPS 1175: Issue 8 fits with the priorities of those specifying security solutions. In Jacksons’ recent study, it’s reported that the most important factor during commissioning was ‘tested and proven effectiveness’ (89%). This shows that there’s the desire to implement security solutions, but there might not be sufficient openly available information to do so. In fact, one fifth (19%) of interviewees listed a lack of technical information as a main challenge.

To read the full article subscribe to The Paper here

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk Xtra (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute’s George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014. Brian was launch Editor for The Paper in September 2015 and appointed Editor of Risk Xtra in May 2018.
  • google-share
Previous Story

Report raises concerns over Met Police trials of live facial recognition technology

Next Story

“Mistrust in Artificial Intelligence risks UK staggering behind in global tech race” warns Confederation of British Industry

Recent Posts

  • IFSEC Europe launched by event organiser Informa in strategic move to extend IFSEC brand
  • Orbis Protect-Keynetics partnership set to enhance security for site managers
  • IDIS Global Partners Summit focuses on analytics and end-to-end solutions
  • Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK join forces to raise awareness of apprenticeship opportunities
  • Make UK/BDO Report: “Industry warns of damaging ‘double whammy’ hit to regions from ‘no-deal’ Brexit outcome”
0

IDIS Global Partners Summit focuses on analytics and end-to-end solutions

The latest advances in video analytics – including improved classification, accuracy and spe
Posted On 23 Oct 2019
0

Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK join forces to raise awareness of apprenticeship opportunities

Skills for Security and WorldSkills UK are launching a new Electronic Security Systems
Posted On 23 Oct 2019

Register for updates

Contact Editorial:

  1. Name *
    * Please enter your name
  2. Email *
    * Please enter a valid email address
  3. Message *
    * Please enter message

© Pro-Activ Publications, 2021.

All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Content on this website, including materials available for download, are supplied solely for the private use of visitors to this site, and must not be redistributed by third party sites, or as part of any marketing or promotional material, without permission in writing from the publisher.While every care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of material included in The Paper (both the hardcopy publications and this website), the publishers cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the information contained herein, or any consequence arising from it.

7ads6x98y